↓ Skip to main content

“My Funky Genetics”: BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers' Understanding of Genetic Inheritance and Reproductive Merger in the Context of New Reprogenetic Technologies

Overview of attention for article published in Families, Systems & Health: The Journal of Collaborative Family HealthCare, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
“My Funky Genetics”: BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers' Understanding of Genetic Inheritance and Reproductive Merger in the Context of New Reprogenetic Technologies
Published in
Families, Systems & Health: The Journal of Collaborative Family HealthCare, January 2012
DOI 10.1037/a0028434
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Deleterious mutations in the BRCA1/BRCA2 genes elevate lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Each child of a mutation-positive parent has a 50% chance of inheriting it. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) permits prospective parents to avoid the birth of a BRCA-mutation-positive child, introducing predictability into a process historically defined by chance. This investigation explored how BRCA1/2 mutation carriers understand genetic inheritance and consider a child's inheritance of a BRCA1/2 mutation, given the opportunities that exist to pursue PGD. Thirty-nine female and male BRCA1/2 mutation carriers of reproductive age were recruited from urban cancer and reproductive medical centers. Participants completed a standardized educational presentation on PGD and prenatal diagnosis, with pre- and posttest assessments. An interdisciplinary team of qualitative researchers analyzed data using grounded theory techniques. Participants expressed the belief that reproduction yields children with unique genetic strengths and challenges, including the BRCA1/2 mutation, family traits for which predictive tests do not exist, and hypothetical genetic risks. Participants expressed preference for biologically related children, yet stated their genetically "well" partner's lineage would be marred through reproductive merger, requiring the well partner to assume the burden of the BRCA1/2 mutation via their children. Participants expressed diverse views of genetically "well" partners' participation in family planning and risk management decisions. Pressure to use reprogenetic technology may grow as genetic susceptibility testing becomes more widely available. Work with individuals and couples across the disease spectrum must be attuned to the ways beliefs about genetic inheritance play into reproductive decision-making.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 100 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Master 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 21%
Psychology 16 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 27 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2012.
All research outputs
#24,782,047
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Families, Systems & Health: The Journal of Collaborative Family HealthCare
#310
of 437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,646
of 304,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Families, Systems & Health: The Journal of Collaborative Family HealthCare
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.