↓ Skip to main content

‘The times are changing’: New Zealand smokers' perceptions of the tobacco endgame

Overview of attention for article published in Tobacco Control, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
‘The times are changing’: New Zealand smokers' perceptions of the tobacco endgame
Published in
Tobacco Control, June 2012
DOI 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050398
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The New Zealand government's goal of achieving a smoke-free society by 2025 reflects growing interest in 'endgame' solutions to tobacco smoking. However, tobacco companies have framed 'endgame' strategies as contrary to individual freedoms and 'choice'; these claims heighten politicians' sensitivity to 'nanny state' allegations and may undermine tobacco control policies. Public support for stronger policies could strengthen political will; however, little is known about how smokers perceive endgame scenarios or the factors underlying their support or opposition to these.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Singapore 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 89 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Other 7 8%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 24%
Social Sciences 17 18%
Psychology 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2013.
All research outputs
#6,175,603
of 29,073,109 outputs
Outputs from Tobacco Control
#2,249
of 3,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,811
of 175,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tobacco Control
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,073,109 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.