↓ Skip to main content

ダケカンバ材の野球バット適性の評価

Overview of attention for article published in Mokuzai Gakkaishi, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ダケカンバ材の野球バット適性の評価
Published in
Mokuzai Gakkaishi, February 2020
DOI 10.2488/jwrs.66.39
Authors

富田 夏生, 村田 功二, 仲村 匡司, 秋津 裕志, 大崎 久司

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,529,883
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Mokuzai Gakkaishi
#3
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,173
of 477,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mokuzai Gakkaishi
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 34 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them