↓ Skip to main content

Appropriateness of waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio cutoffs for different ethnic groups

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Appropriateness of waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio cutoffs for different ethnic groups
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, August 2009
DOI 10.1038/ejcn.2009.70
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Papua New Guinea 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 261 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 12%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Postgraduate 28 10%
Researcher 23 9%
Other 49 18%
Unknown 73 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 7%
Sports and Recreations 14 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 84 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,629,744
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#1,545
of 4,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,384
of 175,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.