↓ Skip to main content

Estimating Judicial Ideal Points in Bi‐Dimensional Courts: Evidence from Catalonia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimating Judicial Ideal Points in Bi‐Dimensional Courts: Evidence from Catalonia
Published in
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, April 2020
DOI 10.1111/jels.12251
Authors

Lucia Dalla Pellegrina, Nuno Garoupa, Marian Gili

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 38%
Other 2 25%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 63%
Psychology 1 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,455,164
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
#128
of 335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,854
of 378,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.