Hypoxic tumors are resistant to conventional therapies through indirect mechanisms such as the selection of resistant phenotype under chronic hypoxia. Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy has been shown to increase oxygen level and induce apoptosis in hypoxic tumor. However, it could produce significant adverse effects including oxygen toxic seizures and severe radiation tissue injury due to high pressure. We have shown that repeated oxygenation at 30% O(2) (1 atmospheres absolute) results in significant regression of MCF-7 tumor xenografts without any adverse effect. In MCF-7 cells, re-oxygenation showed an eightfold increase in cellular apoptosis. Both in hypoxic tumor and in hypoxic cells, that exclusively favor p53 to exist in mutant conformation, re-oxygenation restores p53 wild-type conformation. The oxygen-mediated rescue of mutant p53 followed by its trans-activation is responsible for the induction of p53-downstream apoptotic, cell-cycle arrest and DNA-repair genes. Further, p53 trans-activation may thus be due to its post-translational modifications as a result of re-oxygenation. We have thus concluded that oxygen therapy without pressure, as opposed to HBO therapy, may be ideal for hypoxic tumor regression, which functions through oxygen-mediated rescue of mutant p53 followed by induction of apoptosis.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2025.
All research outputs
#22,105,368
of 33,176,665 outputs
Outputs from Cell Death & Disease
#4,661
of 8,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,859
of 196,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Death & Disease
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,176,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
