↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing malaria control using a computerised management system in southern Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Enhancing malaria control using a computerised management system in southern Africa
Published in
Malaria Journal, June 2003
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-2-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marlize Booman, Brian L Sharp, Carrin L Martin, Bonifacio Manjate, Jacobus J la Grange, David N Durrheim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 7%
Philippines 1 7%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 7%
Unknown 12 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 127%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 67%
Student > Master 9 60%
Student > Postgraduate 5 33%
Other 5 33%
Other 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 93%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 80%
Environmental Science 6 40%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 27%
Social Sciences 4 27%
Other 13 87%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,546
of 5,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,612
of 53,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them