↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease pediatric scale as an outcome measure of disability

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Neurology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Validation of the Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease pediatric scale as an outcome measure of disability
Published in
Annals of Neurology, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/ana.23572
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 153 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Master 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 46 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 58 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2025.
All research outputs
#8,220,458
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Neurology
#3,089
of 5,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,041
of 165,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Neurology
#20
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.