↓ Skip to main content

Tomography of Reaction-Diffusion Microemulsions Reveals Three-Dimensional Turing Patterns

Overview of attention for article published in Science, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tomography of Reaction-Diffusion Microemulsions Reveals Three-Dimensional Turing Patterns
Published in
Science, February 2011
DOI 10.1126/science.1200815
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Spatially periodic, temporally stationary patterns that emerge from instability of a homogeneous steady state were proposed by Alan Turing in 1952 as a mechanism for morphogenesis in living systems and have attracted increasing attention in biology, chemistry, and physics. Patterns found to date have been confined to one or two spatial dimensions. We used tomography to study the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction in a microemulsion in which the polar reactants are confined to aqueous nanodroplets much smaller than the scale of the stationary patterns. We demonstrate the existence of Turing patterns that can exist only in three dimensions, including curved surfaces, hexagonally packed cylinders, spots, and labyrinthine and lamellar patterns.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Japan 2 1%
Poland 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 128 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 22%
Student > Master 14 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 9%
Professor 8 6%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 28 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 17%
Engineering 16 11%
Physics and Astronomy 15 11%
Materials Science 8 6%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 22 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2015.
All research outputs
#2,787,593
of 34,054,827 outputs
Outputs from Science
#33,548
of 93,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,039
of 258,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#153
of 382 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,054,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 382 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.