↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

The first Hubble diagram and cosmological constraints using superluminous supernovae

Overview of attention for article published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The first Hubble diagram and cosmological constraints using superluminous supernovae
Published in
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, April 2021
DOI 10.1093/mnras/stab978
Authors

C Inserra, M Sullivan, C R Angus, E Macaulay, R C Nichol, M Smith, C Frohmaier, C P Gutiérrez, M Vicenzi, A Möller, D Brout, P J Brown, T M Davis, C B D’Andrea, L Galbany, R Kessler, A G Kim, Y-C Pan, M Pursiainen, D Scolnic, B P Thomas, P Wiseman, T M C Abbott, J Annis, S Avila, E Bertin, D Brooks, D L Burke, A Carnero Rosell, M Carrasco Kind, J Carretero, F J Castander, R Cawthon, S Desai, H T Diehl, T F Eifler, D A Finley, B Flaugher, P Fosalba, J Frieman, J Garcia-Bellido, E Gaztanaga, D W Gerdes, T Giannantonio, D Gruen, R A Gruendl, J Gschwend, G Gutierrez, D L Hollowood, K Honscheid, D J James, E Krause, K Kuehn, N Kuropatkin, T S Li, C Lidman, M Lima, M A G Maia, J L Marshall, P Martini, F Menanteau, R Miquel, A A Plazas Malagón, A K Romer, A Roodman, M Sako, E Sanchez, V Scarpine, M Schubnell, S Serrano, I Sevilla-Noarbe, M Soares-Santos, F Sobreira, E Suchyta, M E C Swanson, G Tarle, D Thomas, D L Tucker, V Vikram, A R Walker, Y Zhang, J Asorey, J Calcino, D Carollo, K Glazebrook, S R Hinton, J K Hoormann, G F Lewis, R Sharp, E Swann, B E Tucker,

View on publisher site

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 28 72%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,311,003
of 29,732,941 outputs
Outputs from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#4,943
of 42,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,948
of 466,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#149
of 911 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,732,941 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 911 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.