| Title |
Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Adult Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 — Georgia, March 2020
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.15585/mmwr.mm6918e1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeremy A. W. Gold, Karen K. Wong, Christine M. Szablewski, Priti R. Patel, John Rossow, Juliana da Silva, Pavithra Natarajan, Sapna Bamrah Morris, Robyn Neblett Fanfair, Jessica Rogers-Brown, Beau B. Bruce, Sean D. Browning, Alfonso C. Hernandez-Romieu, Nathan W. Furukawa, Mohleen Kang, Mary E. Evans, Nadine Oosmanally, Melissa Tobin-D’Angelo, Cherie Drenzek, David J. Murphy, Julie Hollberg, James M. Blum, Robert Jansen, David W. Wright, William M. Sewell, Jack D. Owens, Benjamin Lefkove, Frank W. Brown, Deron C. Burton, Timothy M. Uyeki, Stephanie R. Bialek, Brendan R. Jackson |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 847 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 431 | 51% |
| Canada | 15 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 2% |
| Georgia | 7 | <1% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| Australia | 6 | <1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| Comoros | 4 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 55 | 6% |
| Unknown | 301 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 719 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 63 | 7% |
| Scientists | 44 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | 2% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 561 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 561 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 72 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 9% |
| Other | 42 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 7% |
| Other | 121 | 22% |
| Unknown | 174 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 149 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 98 | 17% |
| Unknown | 208 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1714. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2026.
All research outputs
#7,361
of 34,553,382 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#228
of 5,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#389
of 443,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#21
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,553,382 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 275.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.