| Title |
Current perspectives on Coronavirus 2019 (COVID‐19) and cardiovascular disease: A white paper by the JAHA editors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1161/jaha.120.017013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ajay K. Gupta, Hani Jneid, Daniel Addison, Hossein Ardehali, Amelia K. Boehme, Sanket Borgaonkar, Romain Boulestreau, Kevin Clerkin, Nicolas Delarche, Holli A. DeVon, Isabella M. Grumbach, Jose Gutierrez, Daniel A. Jones, Vikas Kapil, Carmela Maniero, Amgad Mentias, Pamela S. Miller, Sher May Ng, Jai D. Parekh, Reynaldo H. Sanchez, Konrad Teodor Sawicki, Anneline S. J. M. te Riele, Carol Ann Remme, Barry London |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 31% |
| Spain | 6 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Argentina | 2 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 16% |
| Scientists | 5 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 265 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 24% |
| Unknown | 78 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 85 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,548,965
of 34,115,020 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
#1,401
of 10,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,463
of 435,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
#52
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,115,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.