You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
市場シェアに知的財産情報を関連づけるイノベーションのための分析方法
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.18919/jkg.70.5_266 |
| Authors |
鈴木 健治, 髙橋 啓治, 芳賀 みのり, 久保田 美央 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,722,525
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#56
of 1,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,940
of 410,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#3
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.