↓ Skip to main content

Fluid dynamics aspects of miniaturized axial-flow blood pump

Overview of attention for article published in Bio-Medical Materials & Engineering, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 239)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
72 patents
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fluid dynamics aspects of miniaturized axial-flow blood pump
Published in
Bio-Medical Materials & Engineering, January 2014
DOI 10.3233/bme-130860
Pubmed ID
Authors

Can Kang, Qifeng Huang, Yunxiao Li

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2026.
All research outputs
#7,542,164
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Bio-Medical Materials & Engineering
#33
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,676
of 306,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bio-Medical Materials & Engineering
#10
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.