↓ Skip to main content

蛋白質工学的手法による枯草菌プロテアーゼ・サチライシンの機能変換に関する研究

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
蛋白質工学的手法による枯草菌プロテアーゼ・サチライシンの機能変換に関する研究
Published in
Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi, January 1997
DOI 10.1271/nogeikagaku1924.71.995
Authors

高木 博史

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,583,638
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi
#639
of 7,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,634
of 93,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.