↓ Skip to main content

Dicyanoborate‐Based Ionic Liquids as Hypergolic Fluids

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dicyanoborate‐Based Ionic Liquids as Hypergolic Fluids
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, November 2010
DOI 10.1002/anie.201005748
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanqiang Zhang, Jean'ne M. Shreeve

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,244,438
of 33,503,639 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#21,291
of 60,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,776
of 149,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#74
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,503,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 60,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.