↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neuroprotective effects and magnetic resonance imaging of mesenchymal stem cells labeled with SPION in a rat model of Huntington's disease
Published in
Stem Cell Research, May 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.scr.2012.05.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have been tested and proven effective in some neurodegenerative diseases, but their tracking after transplantation may be challenging. Our group has previously demonstrated the feasibility and biosafety of rat MSC labeling with iron oxide superparamagnetic nanoparticles (SPION). In this study, we investigated the therapeutic potential of SPION-labeled MSC in a rat model of Huntington's disease, a genetic degenerative disease with characteristic deletion of striatal GABAergic neurons. MSC labeled with SPION were injected into the striatum 1h after quinolinic acid injection. FJ-C analysis demonstrated that MSC transplantation significantly decreased the number of degenerating neurons in the damaged striatum 7 days after lesion. In this period, MSC transplantation enhanced the striatal expression of FGF-2 but did not affect subventricular zone proliferation, as demonstrated by Ki67 proliferation assay. In addition, MSC transplantation significantly reduced the ventriculomegaly in the lesioned brain. MRI and histological techniques detected the presence of the SPION-labeled cells at the lesion site. SPION-labeled MSC produced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signals that were visible for at least 60 days after transplantation. Our data highlight the potential of adult MSC to reduce brain damage under neurodegenerative diseases and indicate the use of nanoparticles in cell tracking, supporting their potential as valuable tools for cell therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 18%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research
#1,302
of 1,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,679
of 178,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,967 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.