↓ Skip to main content

Guarding Pain and Spontaneous Activity of Nociceptors after Skin versus Skin Plus Deep Tissue Incision

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesiology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Guarding Pain and Spontaneous Activity of Nociceptors after Skin versus Skin Plus Deep Tissue Incision
Published in
Anesthesiology, January 2010
DOI 10.1097/aln.0b013e3181c2952e
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor 6 7%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 27 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 17 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2026.
All research outputs
#5,874,532
of 26,966,971 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#2,035
of 6,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,930
of 179,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#11
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,966,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.