↓ Skip to main content

Designing watershed programs to pay farmers for water quality services: Case studies of Munich and New York City

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Economics, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
7 policy sources
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Designing watershed programs to pay farmers for water quality services: Case studies of Munich and New York City
Published in
Ecological Economics, April 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.006
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 4 2%
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 196 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Researcher 32 15%
Other 10 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 44 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 51 24%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 28 13%
Social Sciences 25 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 9%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 59 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2026.
All research outputs
#2,138,782
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Economics
#603
of 5,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,662
of 208,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Economics
#3
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.