You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Full Factorial Design, Central Composite Design, and Box-Behnken Design in Chromatographic Method Development for the Determination of Fluconazole and Its Impurities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical Letters, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1080/00032719.2013.867503 |
| Authors |
Tijana Rakić, Irena Kasagić-Vujanović, Marko Jovanović, Biljana Jančić-Stojanović, Darko Ivanović |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 422 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 422 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 13% |
| Researcher | 43 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Unknown | 135 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 88 | 21% |
| Chemical Engineering | 44 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 36 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 50 | 12% |
| Unknown | 161 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,607,065
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from Analytical Letters
#504
of 632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,408
of 228,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical Letters
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.