| Title |
Social Network Modulation of Reward-Related Signals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuroscience, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1523/jneurosci.0610-12.2012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Everyday goals and experiences are often shared with others who may hold different places within our social networks. We investigated whether the experience of sharing a reward differs with respect to social network. Twenty human participants played a card guessing game for shared monetary outcomes with three partners: a computer, a confederate (out of network), and a friend (in network). Participants subjectively rated the experience of sharing a reward more positively with their friends than the other partners. Neuroimaging results support participants' subjective reports, as ventral striatal BOLD responses were more robust when sharing monetary gains with a friend as compared to the confederate or computer, suggesting a higher value for sharing with an in-network partner. Interestingly, ratings of social closeness covaried with this activity, resulting in a significant partner × closeness interaction; exploratory analysis showed that only participants reporting higher levels of closeness demonstrated partner-related differences in striatal BOLD response. These results suggest that reward valuation in social contexts is sensitive to distinctions of social network, such that sharing positive experiences with in-network others may carry higher value. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 30% |
| United States | 3 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Comoros | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 247 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 26% |
| Researcher | 51 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 114 | 42% |
| Neuroscience | 38 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 56 | 20% |