↓ Skip to main content

Unicellular Cyanobacterial Distributions Broaden the Oceanic N2 Fixation Domain

Overview of attention for article published in Science, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
397 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Unicellular Cyanobacterial Distributions Broaden the Oceanic N2 Fixation Domain
Published in
Science, February 2010
DOI 10.1126/science.1185468
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Nitrogen (N2)-fixing microorganisms (diazotrophs) are an important source of biologically available fixed N in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and control the productivity of oligotrophic ocean ecosystems. We found that two major groups of unicellular N2-fixing cyanobacteria (UCYN) have distinct spatial distributions that differ from those of Trichodesmium, the N2-fixing cyanobacterium previously considered to be the most important contributor to open-ocean N2 fixation. The distributions and activity of the two UCYN groups were separated as a function of depth, temperature, and water column density structure along an 8000-kilometer transect in the South Pacific Ocean. UCYN group A can be found at high abundances at substantially higher latitudes and deeper in subsurface ocean waters than Trichodesmium. These findings have implications for the geographic extent and magnitude of basin-scale oceanic N2 fixation rates.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 397 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
Germany 4 1%
Japan 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 363 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 86 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 21%
Student > Master 52 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 22 6%
Student > Bachelor 19 5%
Other 64 16%
Unknown 71 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116 29%
Environmental Science 81 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 68 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 5%
Chemistry 5 1%
Other 20 5%
Unknown 86 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2026.
All research outputs
#10,608,679
of 33,143,744 outputs
Outputs from Science
#57,447
of 93,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,946
of 136,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#306
of 394 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,143,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 394 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.