You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of body size on estimation of mammalian area requirements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.13495 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael J. Noonan, Christen H. Fleming, Marlee A. Tucker, Roland Kays, Autumn‐Lynn Harrison, Margaret C. Crofoot, Briana Abrahms, Susan C. Alberts, Abdullahi H. Ali, Jeanne Altmann, Pamela Castro Antunes, Nina Attias, Jerrold L. Belant, Dean E. Beyer, Laura R. Bidner, Niels Blaum, Randall B. Boone, Damien Caillaud, Rogerio Cunha de Paula, J. Antonio de la Torre, Jasja Dekker, Christopher S. DePerno, Mohammad Farhadinia, Julian Fennessy, Claudia Fichtel, Christina Fischer, Adam Ford, Jacob R. Goheen, Rasmus W. Havmøller, Ben T. Hirsch, Cindy Hurtado, Lynne A. Isbell, René Janssen, Florian Jeltsch, Petra Kaczensky, Yayoi Kaneko, Peter Kappeler, Anjan Katna, Matthew Kauffman, Flavia Koch, Abhijeet Kulkarni, Scott LaPoint, Peter Leimgruber, David W. Macdonald, A. Catherine Markham, Laura McMahon, Katherine Mertes, Christopher E. Moorman, Ronaldo G. Morato, Alexander M. Moßbrucker, Guilherme Mourão, David O'Connor, Luiz Gustavo R. Oliveira‐Santos, Jennifer Pastorini, Bruce D. Patterson, Janet Rachlow, Dustin H. Ranglack, Neil Reid, David M. Scantlebury, Dawn M. Scott, Nuria Selva, Agnieszka Sergiel, Melissa Songer, Nucharin Songsasen, Jared A. Stabach, Jenna Stacy‐Dawes, Morgan B. Swingen, Jeffrey J. Thompson, Wiebke Ullmann, Abi Tamim Vanak, Maria Thaker, John W. Wilson, Koji Yamazaki, Richard W. Yarnell, Filip Zieba, Tomasz Zwijacz‐Kozica, William F. Fagan, Thomas Mueller, Justin M. Calabrese |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 194 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 8% |
| Australia | 10 | 5% |
| South Africa | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| India | 5 | 3% |
| Chile | 4 | 2% |
| Finland | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 70 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 94 | 48% |
| Scientists | 87 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 17% |
| Researcher | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 57 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#375,246
of 25,853,983 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#175
of 4,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,858
of 435,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#10
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,853,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.