↓ Skip to main content

Mean CD4 cell count changes in patients failing a first-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mean CD4 cell count changes in patients failing a first-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-12-147
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Changes in CD4 cell counts are poorly documented in individuals with low or moderate-level viremia while on antiretroviral treatment (ART) in resource-limited settings. We assessed the impact of on-going HIV-RNA replication on CD4 cell count slopes in patients treated with a first-line combination ART.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Researcher 10 20%
Other 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2012.
All research outputs
#16,686,913
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,499
of 8,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,157
of 179,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#36
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.