↓ Skip to main content

Books: Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed For Men: Mind the Gap

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
459 Mendeley
Title
Books: Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed For Men: Mind the Gap
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, April 2020
DOI 10.3399/bjgp20x709745
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Baskett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 459 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 459 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 15%
Student > Bachelor 41 9%
Researcher 36 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 168 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 73 16%
Arts and Humanities 29 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 24 5%
Psychology 23 5%
Engineering 18 4%
Other 113 25%
Unknown 179 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,954,186
of 24,585,148 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,600
of 4,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,374
of 380,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#29
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,585,148 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.