↓ Skip to main content

Pain transduction: a pharmacologic perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pain transduction: a pharmacologic perspective
Published in
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, May 2016
DOI 10.1080/17512433.2016.1183481
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Pain represents a necessary physiological function yet remains a significant pathological process in humans across the world. The transduction of a nociceptive stimulus refers to the processes that turn a noxious stimulus into a transmissible neurological signal. This involves a number of ion channels that facilitate the conversion of nociceptive stimulus into an electrical signal. Because an understanding of nociceptive physiology complements a discussion of analgesic pharmacology, the relationships between the two are presented together. In this review article, a critical evaluation is provided on the findings relating to both the physiology and pharmacology of relevant acid-sensing ion channels (ASIC), and transient receptor potential (TRP) cation channels, and voltage-gated sodium (Nav) channels.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 249 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Student > Master 17 7%
Researcher 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 133 53%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 8%
Neuroscience 18 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 140 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2021.
All research outputs
#21,176,900
of 32,155,846 outputs
Outputs from Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
#590
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,902
of 329,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
#15
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,155,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.