↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Predicting loss and fragmentation of habitat of the vulnerable subtropical rainforest tree Macadamia integrifolia with models developed from compiled ecological data
Published in
Biological Conservation, June 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.013
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
Norway 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 76 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 19%
Other 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 47%
Environmental Science 23 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,738,413
of 28,812,439 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,114
of 7,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,437
of 118,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#30
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,812,439 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.