| Title |
Multi-tiered screening and diagnosis strategy for COVID-19: a model for sustainable testing capacity in response to pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Medicine, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/07853890.2020.1763449 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael S. Pulia, Terrence P. O’Brien, Peter C. Hou, Andrew Schuman, Robert Sambursky |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 281 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 13% |
| Researcher | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 53 | 19% |
| Unknown | 84 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Engineering | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 54 | 19% |
| Unknown | 91 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,806,071
of 31,660,612 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Medicine
#204
of 2,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,064
of 434,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Medicine
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,660,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.