↓ Skip to main content

Ketamine/propofol admixture (ketofol) is associated with improved hemodynamics as an induction agent

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ketamine/propofol admixture (ketofol) is associated with improved hemodynamics as an induction agent
Published in
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The, July 2012
DOI 10.1097/ta.0b013e318250cdb8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Critically ill patients may require emergent intubations, and the use of some induction agents can lead to undesirable effects on hemodynamics. The use of "ketofol" (ketamine/propofol admixture) may allow for improved hemodynamic control. The primary aim of this study was to assess the hemodynamic effects of "ketofol" in a fixed-dose combination during induction of general anesthesia in a controlled environment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 117 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 20 17%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 29 24%
Unknown 28 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,100,701
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The
#1,832
of 5,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,499
of 211,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The
#29
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.