↓ Skip to main content

Discrepancies in global vitamin C recommendations: a review of RDA criteria and underlying health perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Discrepancies in global vitamin C recommendations: a review of RDA criteria and underlying health perspectives
Published in
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, March 2020
DOI 10.1080/10408398.2020.1744513
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 187 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Master 12 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 98 52%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Chemistry 6 3%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 101 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2025.
All research outputs
#1,093,147
of 32,836,612 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
#322
of 3,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,376
of 415,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
#12
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,836,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.