Selected research and primary sources: Historical antivaccination movements: https://t.co/vM5GV3wJZp MMR and autism, 657,461-child cohort: https://t.co/Z9VplVbd73 Political evolution of vaccine activism: https://t.co/s68NRbbl5g Online vaccine networ…
RT @m_datasci_: 「あちら側」は、ちゃんと世に出るための努力をしているんだよね https://t.co/G3h2jgjeW8
RT @m_datasci_: 「あちら側」は、ちゃんと世に出るための努力をしているんだよね https://t.co/G3h2jgjeW8
「あちら側」は、ちゃんと世に出るための努力をしているんだよね https://t.co/G3h2jgjeW8
RT @FutureProofHlth: #Vaccination has been a vital tool in the fight against COVID-19, but distrust in vaccines is on the rise. A study in…
Why is distrust in vaccines on the rise 👇🏼
@CdrHBiscuitIII @charlot03622580 @Mark_Butler_MP @NSWHealth @VictorianCHO @SAHealth When it reaches a popular morning show, we’re in worse shape I thought we’d end up Online misinformation is the scourge of our time https://t.co/iSt7tJC2b8
RT @mattsheffield: This is an interesting paper attempting to model how false content could overwhelm quality content on vaccines. Even w…
RT @mattsheffield: This is an interesting paper attempting to model how false content could overwhelm quality content on vaccines. Even w…
RT @mattsheffield: This is an interesting paper attempting to model how false content could overwhelm quality content on vaccines. Even w…
This is an interesting paper attempting to model how false content could overwhelm quality content on vaccines. Even without AI scale, junk antivax trash could actually overwhelm public awareness on just this one topic. And why not many others? https…
Massive cuts to science and medicine in Trump budget https://t.co/m7Dl5LUEEI The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination https://t.co/QFEETIJP2T views https://t.co/cuz4nfWsMt Winning Trump’s praise was easy for Pfizer. https://t.co/oMPiQmcm…
RT @MatthewRehrl: @ConscienHealth I think digital trust is essential for us to understand. For example, I contend that anti vac. folks hav…
@ConscienHealth I think digital trust is essential for us to understand. For example, I contend that anti vac. folks have much better (effective) “digital trust” networks than health departments and hospitals. Ref: https://t.co/KO0MuuIljH (FYI: Red i…
RT @FrankDElia7: The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views | Nature https://t.co/CFEyCZPIcI
The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views | Nature https://t.co/CFEyCZPIcI
@MahaRehman1 Lots of materials on this topic in the public health and network science literature. This is a good one: https://t.co/ZbYt7uoCmR and more here https://t.co/N8guoCahU7
@ConscienHealth @mathbabedotorg For example, I think Facebook has been deeply problematic during Covid, as this Nature Article from 2020 suggests: https://t.co/KO0Muuqc5z
@ovtKXO7dsDHrd8P @dragonandphoeni 引用RTにあるスクショの引用文献のデマ 1)↓ https://t.co/grYggwjKlI 2) https://t.co/AYMThJKzTK ???｢デマに興味があります｣みたいな？
RT @FlossObama: This is a great article (older 2020). If anything, it offers a glimpse of how advanced the understanding of how social med…
RT @FlossObama: This is a great article (older 2020). If anything, it offers a glimpse of how advanced the understanding of how social med…
The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views | Nature https://t.co/0nvA8AgHlS
RT @FlossObama: This is a great article (older 2020). If anything, it offers a glimpse of how advanced the understanding of how social med…
This is a great article (older 2020). If anything, it offers a glimpse of how advanced the understanding of how social media can be used to influence public opinion has become. Not sure what to think about this, mixed feelings, to say the least. http…
Although smaller in overall size, anti-vaccination clusters manage to become highly entangled with undecided clusters in the main online network, whereas pro-vaccination clusters are more peripheral https://t.co/u767wXR1bj I ❤️ data
@Vortex_Egg no, because unfortunately aside from internal leaked documents there is almost no research on the recommendation engine nudging these communities together. it simply isn't something we can do. there IS some work on the organic efforts. htt…
@NawazFaisal_ai @DrNehaPidatala @kevinmd @fqure Wow! Excellent! Thank you. I took a course from Aral years ago and he was superb. Now, combine above with this Nature paper ( https://t.co/KO0Muuqc5z) which I see as a paper about "digital trust" and you…
@DrCSWilliam You were there, way back. 😔 Interestingly, after reading this article by a physicist in Nature in May 2020, I recognized that 20-30% of the US will never, ever get vaccinated ⟹ this will be a "forever" problem. (Decade +?) https://t.co/KO…
“anti-vaccination clusters manage to become highly entangled with undecided clusters in the main online network, whereas pro-vaccination clusters are more peripheral.” - scary :(
Came across this article in Nature while reading about pro-vaccine comms for social media, which has a framework that predicts the recent ‘explosive growth’ in anti-vaccination views will continue and that these views will ‘dominate in a decade’ https://t…
We need to look at the bigger picture, understand how people work and present information in an independent, credible and partisan manner. By having pro- or -anti- views, the mind is made up. it's closed. People aren't listening. We need to keep discuss…
I didn’t know it was this bad + the already percolating antivax networks discussed by Johnson et al before COVID https://t.co/WNMllnKjOl @kevinfolta @ProfEmilyOster
RT @Nicola_Bressi: @HariSel95300131 @ppisati457 Vero. E temo di essere utile a pochi. Ciò che si palessa è l'impossibilità di contastare od…
@HariSel95300131 @ppisati457 Vero. E temo di essere utile a pochi. Ciò che si palessa è l'impossibilità di contastare odio e menzogne che hanno molto più appeal. https://t.co/Ue2nFHUK0p Tuttavia, non vedo alternative.
RT @yoongkhean: Pro vaccine groups may be losing without knowing. Source: https://t.co/Lsd4vH0xoF https://t.co/CQhB8bb7qZ
human herd instinct at work. when asked why she thought it happened, a holocaust survivor said (to paraphrase): "10% of ppl are good, 10% evil. the other 80% just follow who is leading"
RT @yoongkhean: Pro vaccine groups may be losing without knowing. Source: https://t.co/Lsd4vH0xoF https://t.co/CQhB8bb7qZ
RT @yoongkhean: Pro vaccine groups may be losing without knowing. Source: https://t.co/Lsd4vH0xoF https://t.co/CQhB8bb7qZ
Pro vaccine groups may be losing without knowing. Source: https://t.co/Lsd4vH0xoF https://t.co/CQhB8bb7qZ
RT @linda72135856: @DrEricDing @GovernorLittle @JaniceMcGeachin This article is interesting.
RT @MatthewRehrl: @DrJRMarcelin @angie_rasmussen @IDSAInfo @taliaswartz As an aside , I don't think most healthcare organizations have stud…
@DrJRMarcelin @angie_rasmussen @IDSAInfo @taliaswartz As an aside , I don't think most healthcare organizations have studied and thought about this 2020 Nature Article, and what it means about network penetration. Most healthcare orgs–as institutions—a…
The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views | Nature https://t.co/rDFYGXEdEo
Johnson, N. F., Velásquez, N., Restrepo, N. J., Leahy, R., Gabriel, N., El Oud, S., Zheng, M., Manrique, P., Wuchty, S., & Lupu, Y. (2020). The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views. Nature, 582(7811), 230–233. https://t.co/XqpYfl…
Although written May2020, this research on how #disinformation clusters spread is eerily similar to how #covid19 #deltavariant spread amongst us. The mapping gives a visual to this public disease of the mind. https://t.co/CbxV0lksWo
@imTolstoyevski Geçen sene de benzer bir araştırma olmuştu. Covid-19 öncesi aşı karşıtlığının feysbuk aktivitesini incelemişlerdi yazarlar. https://t.co/9wdwgJConf
@ambo_terno @MarcoStac @adriawildlife Magari, Gaia, ciascuno rimanesse dove sta. La realtà dei fatti (e non la vedo certo solo io: https://t.co/Ue2nFIckRX ) è che i complottisti/negazionisti fanno sempre più proseliti. Mi sembra di parlare a voce normale …
The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views | Nature https://t.co/Gq3yO3f0fk
https://t.co/7DpG0CuUPu @kevinfolta @CamiDRyan @katy_milkman thinking back on this paper "Our theoretical framework reproduces the recent explosive growth in anti-vaccination views, & predicts that these views will dominate in a decade" and wonder (…
@benegotherit https://t.co/8QO6T1KpqD I found this super insightful in understanding the anti-vax movement. Not sure what policy moves could solve this.
@Cascadia @KingCountyWA thanks for the great article! Defining moment : we (healthcare) doesn't have a handle on Covid and digital information spread was with this article in Nature last year. We do need to think about networks more, so in that sense…
@alcinx Con chiunque divulghi idiozie complottiste. Per una serie di motivi ben studiati, le bufale sono condivise 60 volte (60 VOLTE !) di più delle notizie comprovate. Non è farina del mio sacco, basta vedere lo stupendo documentario #TheSocialDilemma o…
Bilimsel şüphe ≠ veri olmadan sallamak, cımbızla seçip paylaşmak, manipüle edip paylaşmak, uzmanlık alanından bağımsız taraflı yorumlar yapmak. gidişat kötü. https://t.co/jwEL5s4n3r
@arghavan_salles @FutureDocs @DrCindyMDuke @keishaydavis @drjrutland @docdanmd @AllergyHealth Re: the battlefield: here’s a picture of it In this little-read Nature paper (ref: https://t.co/KO0Muuqc5z) https://t.co/Dat4WeBR5C
https://t.co/gAMGrjGttM The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views
@lostatoincrisi @RanierideMaria Ahimè, abbiamo da tempo superato il #PuntoDiNonRitorno di una comunicazione credibile e di una leadership (anche scientifica) affidabile. La frittata è ormai fatta e non si torna indietro. Oh, non lo dico (solo) io, ma inqu…
RT @Nicola_Bressi: I PEGGIORI NEMICI DELLA SALUTE PUBBLICA? I SOCIAL Uno dei più intriganti lavori scientifici che mi sia capitato di legge…
@CNQTheorie2 @vlanx0 Je suis surtout circonspect devant "douze personnes sont responsables de 65% des contenus anti-vaccinaux". Les analyses que je connais du mouvement anti-vaccinal parlent au contraire d'un mouvement très diffus et incontrôlable... htt…
RT @Nicola_Bressi: I PEGGIORI NEMICI DELLA SALUTE PUBBLICA? I SOCIAL Uno dei più intriganti lavori scientifici che mi sia capitato di legge…
RT @Nicola_Bressi: I PEGGIORI NEMICI DELLA SALUTE PUBBLICA? I SOCIAL Uno dei più intriganti lavori scientifici che mi sia capitato di legge…
RT @Nicola_Bressi: I PEGGIORI NEMICI DELLA SALUTE PUBBLICA? I SOCIAL Uno dei più intriganti lavori scientifici che mi sia capitato di legge…
@MicheleRond @docdrugztore Non c'è nessun mistero né complotto Ma solo tanta ingoranza Che sarà sempre maggiore: servono pecore non persone in grado di capire e ragionare https://t.co/XqOVhKFOvm
RT @Nicola_Bressi: I PEGGIORI NEMICI DELLA SALUTE PUBBLICA? I SOCIAL Uno dei più intriganti lavori scientifici che mi sia capitato di legge…
RT @Nicola_Bressi: I PEGGIORI NEMICI DELLA SALUTE PUBBLICA? I SOCIAL Uno dei più intriganti lavori scientifici che mi sia capitato di legge…
I PEGGIORI NEMICI DELLA SALUTE PUBBLICA? I SOCIAL Uno dei più intriganti lavori scientifici che mi sia capitato di leggere; anche se le conclusioni sono agghiaccianti 🥶 "secondo il nostro modello predittivo, entro 10 anni l'ideologia novax sarà dominante…
RT @AGU_SciComm: The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views https://t.co/mVIfQW73Kh #SciComm #COVID19 https://t.co/CVi8…
The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views https://t.co/mVIfQW73Kh #SciComm #COVID19 https://t.co/CVi8VxalyW
RT @AGU_SciComm: The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views https://t.co/eivhvu8ZoH #SciComm #COVID19 https://t.co/Ur2h…
The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views https://t.co/eivhvu8ZoH #SciComm #COVID19 https://t.co/Ur2hxNvNCZ
＞RT 元論文。 https://t.co/JyyhwUStw9
@Agrebiqueen @EvanFourmizz https://t.co/U6VUKWCQFk Même si on exagère beaucoup en allant jusqu'à 10%, c'est quand même une minorité qu'on entant un peu trop... #antivax #pasDeRestoPourLesRigolos
Dear Afrikans, Please read this https://t.co/LYJ0f3xEF4 #COVIDVaccination #conspiracy @KEMRI_Wellcome @_AfricanUnion
@Nature this paper is great. It is an eye opener. However, did you change how abstracts are written? Students have been taught that NEVER TO CITE IN THE ABSTRACT. https://t.co/LYJ0f3xEF4 https://t.co/O5HHvB5TI6
RT @AGU_SciComm: The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views https://t.co/BGCFpReAbH #SciComm #COVID19 https://t.co/zq5R…
RT @AGU_SciComm: The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views https://t.co/BGCFpReAbH #SciComm #COVID19 https://t.co/zq5R…
RT @AGU_SciComm: The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views https://t.co/BGCFpReAbH #SciComm #COVID19 https://t.co/zq5R…
The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views https://t.co/BGCFpReAbH #SciComm #COVID19 https://t.co/zq5RSGYekM
We don't think we've ever seen a paper cite 14 sources for a single idea, but this one does for the concept of dangerous scientific mistrust: https://t.co/Dmoi1XPLzb
The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views https://t.co/9xVuwhnRVI #SciComm #COVID19 https://t.co/GqxN6XOOTX
RT @ezgimou: Boş konuşmuyoruz. İnsanlar analiz etmiş. Aşı karşıtları kararsızlara daha iyi nüfuz ediyor. Bu da aslında aşı karşıtlığına kar…
Boş konuşmuyoruz. İnsanlar analiz etmiş. Aşı karşıtları kararsızlara daha iyi nüfuz ediyor. Bu da aslında aşı karşıtlığına karşı daha iyi politikalar üretmek gerektiğini ortaya koyuyor. https://t.co/4DAOkfIC9u
@DrCSWilliam @sinanaral My general sense, supported by this Nature article from last year, is that although individual docs such as yourself are on the digital battlefield, healthcare institutions are absent. https://t.co/KO0Muuqc5z
Arastirmalar, dogruluk elden gittiginde, antivax'larin cekimserleri domine ettigini gosteriyor. Sanki masummus gibi ortaya surulen vesveseler, carpitmalar aslinda tahmin ettigimizden cok daha genis bir etki alanina sahipler. https://t.co/s26TBNR1qg http…
@symscovington @mkozturk Şu çalışmaya bakılırsa, sosyal medyayı daha aktif ve çeşitlilik sunarak kullanmaları bile bir neden: https://t.co/4DAOkfIC9u
Third: Johnson et al. (2020). This article, titled “The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views”, explores a large dataset of people expressing vaccination views on Facebook to provide a "a map of the contention surrounding vaccines". …
Why is this important, at least for Covid? Because in the undecided space, the "anti" folks are dominating the game: (REF: https://t.co/KO0Muuqc5z) https://t.co/qF0cFKrlLQ
RT @piskotk: @LBoljka @klitomaz @FrekvencaX @MajaRatej Seveda je to samo ena raziskava in specifično vezana na splet. Jaz se trudim s čim v…
Published last year in Nature, a powerful opening sentence in their abstract with 14 citations to back it up, the whole paper has only 33 citations. https://t.co/qkvvFfcV8l https://t.co/NDaUTcUbRP
@LBoljka @klitomaz @FrekvencaX @MajaRatej Seveda je to samo ena raziskava in specifično vezana na splet. Jaz se trudim s čim več ljudmi pogovarjati in spodbuditi cepljenje. https://t.co/aoqCbCs4DW
The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views | Nature https://t.co/AUYMLe4CJa
RT @charlierobinson: Here is "a map of the contention surrounding vaccines that has emerged from the global pool of around three billion Fa…
RT @charlierobinson: Here is "a map of the contention surrounding vaccines that has emerged from the global pool of around three billion Fa…