↓ Skip to main content

Using Natural Selection to Explore the Adaptive Potential of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using Natural Selection to Explore the Adaptive Potential of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0092533
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 101 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 26%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 5 5%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 27%
Engineering 4 4%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,623,347
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#47,448
of 224,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,204
of 268,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,250
of 5,758 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,758 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.