↓ Skip to main content

Consensus Guidelines for Delineation of Clinical Target Volume for Intensity-Modulated Pelvic Radiotherapy for the Definitive Treatment of Cervix Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
guideline
3 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
415 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Consensus Guidelines for Delineation of Clinical Target Volume for Intensity-Modulated Pelvic Radiotherapy for the Definitive Treatment of Cervix Cancer
Published in
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, May 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 415 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 399 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 63 15%
Researcher 56 13%
Student > Postgraduate 48 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 11%
Student > Master 31 7%
Other 83 20%
Unknown 90 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 235 57%
Physics and Astronomy 21 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Computer Science 3 <1%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 121 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2026.
All research outputs
#3,675,713
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#1,760
of 15,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,687
of 150,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#6
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.