↓ Skip to main content

Regain in Body Mass After Weigh-In is Linked to Success in Real Life Judo Competition.

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Sport Nutrition, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Regain in Body Mass After Weigh-In is Linked to Success in Real Life Judo Competition.
Published in
International Journal of Sport Nutrition, August 2016
DOI 10.1123/ijsnem.2015-0359
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We examined the relationship between the re-gain of body mass (BM) after weigh-in and success in real-life judo competition. Eighty-six (36♀/50♂) senior judoka volunteered for this observational study of an international judo competition. Subjects were weighed at the official weigh-in and one hour before their first competition fight (15-20 hours later). Regain in BM after weigh-in was compared between medal winners and non-medallists, winners and losers of each fight, males and females and across weight divisions. Heavyweights were excluded from analysis. Pre-fight BM was greater than BM at official weigh-in for both males and females, with % BM gains of 2.3±2.0 (p=<0.0001; ES= 1.59; CI95% [1.63, 2.98]) and 3.1±2.2 (p=<0.0001; ES=2.03; CI95% [2.30, 3.89]), respectively. No significant differences were found between weight divisions for post weigh-in BM re-gain. Differences in post weigh-in BM re-gain were significantly higher in medal winners than non-medallists for males and females combined (1.4±0.4% BM; p=0.0026; ES= 0.69; CI95% [0.05, 2.34]) and for males alone (1.5±0.6% BM; p=0.017; ES= 0.74; CI95% [0.02, 2.64]), but not for females (1.2±0.7% BM; p=0.096; ES=0.58; CI95% [-0.02, 2.31]). Differences in BM re-gain after weigh-in between winners and losers were significant across all fights (0.9±0.3% BM; p=0.0021; ES= 0.43; CI95% [0.31, 1.41]) but not for first round fights (0.8±0.5% BM; p=0.1386, ES=0.38; CI95% [-0.26, 1.86]). Winners showed a greater re-gain in BM post weigh-in than losers. This may reflect the greater magnitude of the BM loss needed to achieve weigh-in targets which also relates to the experience level of successful athletes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 110 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Researcher 6 5%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 32 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 37 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 35 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2017.
All research outputs
#10,431,641
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Sport Nutrition
#797
of 1,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,340
of 342,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Sport Nutrition
#20
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.