↓ Skip to main content

Use of Transdermal Melatonin Delivery to Improve Sleep Maintenance During Daytime

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents
reddit
6 Redditors
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Use of Transdermal Melatonin Delivery to Improve Sleep Maintenance During Daytime
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, July 2009
DOI 10.1038/clpt.2009.109
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Oral melatonin (MEL) can improve daytime sleep, but the hormone's short elimination half-life limits its use as a hypnotic in shift workers and individuals with jet lag or other sleep problems. Here we show, in healthy subjects, that transdermal delivery of MEL during the daytime can elevate plasma MEL and reduce waking after sleep onset, by promoting sleep in the latter part of an 8-h sleep opportunity. Transdermal MEL may have advantages over fast-release oral MEL in improving sleep maintenance during adverse circadian phases.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 32 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Psychology 4 5%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 34 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2025.
All research outputs
#900,328
of 32,692,245 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#104
of 5,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,290
of 163,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,692,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.