| Title |
The contribution of diabetic micro-angiopathy to adverse outcomes in COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108217 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin B. Whyte, Prashanth Vas, Christian Heiss, Michael D. Feher |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 42% |
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Scientists | 5 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,491,118
of 28,844,741 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice
#473
of 3,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,394
of 439,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice
#20
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,844,741 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.