↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of ratio and allometric scaling methods for normalizing power and strength in elite rugby union players

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sports Sciences, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A comparison of ratio and allometric scaling methods for normalizing power and strength in elite rugby union players
Published in
Journal of Sports Sciences, December 2009
DOI 10.1080/02640410903348657
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
French Polynesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 116 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 25%
Student > Bachelor 22 18%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 76 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#21,011,157
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sports Sciences
#3,702
of 4,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,964
of 179,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sports Sciences
#22
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.