↓ Skip to main content

Pain Analysis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Irreversible Electroporation versus Radiofrequency Ablation—Initial Observations

Overview of attention for article published in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pain Analysis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Irreversible Electroporation versus Radiofrequency Ablation—Initial Observations
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00270-012-0426-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 43%
Engineering 7 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Psychology 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2022.
All research outputs
#5,864,784
of 26,889,804 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#368
of 2,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,121
of 179,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,889,804 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,925 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.