↓ Skip to main content

Neuropsychiatric adverse events of chloroquine: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience Trends, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
Title
Neuropsychiatric adverse events of chloroquine: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database
Published in
BioScience Trends, April 2020
DOI 10.5582/bst.2020.03082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenichiro Sato, Tatsuo Mano, Atsushi Iwata, Tatsushi Toda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 266 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 13%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Other 20 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 58 22%
Unknown 77 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Computer Science 9 3%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 81 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,574,526
of 25,468,789 outputs
Outputs from BioScience Trends
#65
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,205
of 404,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience Trends
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,789 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.