↓ Skip to main content

What we know, do not know, and need to know about climate change vulnerability in the western Canadian Arctic: a systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
359 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What we know, do not know, and need to know about climate change vulnerability in the western Canadian Arctic: a systematic literature review
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), February 2010
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014008
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 7 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 341 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 20%
Researcher 59 16%
Student > Master 55 15%
Student > Bachelor 30 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 68 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 104 29%
Social Sciences 50 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 28 8%
Engineering 14 4%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 76 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,788,989
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#2,685
of 8,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,102
of 233,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.