↓ Skip to main content

Estimating risk from underpowered, but statistically significant, studies: was APPROVe on TARGET?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
2 Q&A threads

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Estimating risk from underpowered, but statistically significant, studies: was APPROVe on TARGET?
Published in
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics, December 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2010.01222.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Researcher 3 16%
Professor 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Philosophy 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,093,186
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics
#366
of 1,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,590
of 254,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.