↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the Evidence‐Based practice Attitude and utilization SurvEy for complementary and alternative medicine practitioners

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluation of the Evidence‐Based practice Attitude and utilization SurvEy for complementary and alternative medicine practitioners
Published in
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, October 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01046.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor 6 8%
Other 19 26%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 19%
Psychology 5 7%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2020.
All research outputs
#9,911,616
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
#675
of 1,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,562
of 145,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.