| Title |
Evidence-based best practice advice for patients treated with systemic immunosuppressants in relation to COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics in Dermatology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2020.05.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fabrizio Galimberti, Jeffrey McBride, Megan Cronin, Yumeng Li, Joshua Fox, Michael Abrouk, Alexander Herbst, Robert S Kirsner |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 165 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 22% |
| Unknown | 58 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 63 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2025.
All research outputs
#11,206,643
of 33,977,172 outputs
Outputs from Clinics in Dermatology
#665
of 1,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,475
of 447,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics in Dermatology
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,977,172 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.