↓ Skip to main content

線維筋痛症の痛みをどうとらえるか : 慢性疼痛のモデル的疾患として(シンポジウム:慢性疼痛の基礎と臨床,2008年,第49回日本心身医学会総会(札幌))

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
線維筋痛症の痛みをどうとらえるか : 慢性疼痛のモデル的疾患として(シンポジウム:慢性疼痛の基礎と臨床,2008年,第49回日本心身医学会総会(札幌))
Published in
Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine, August 2009
DOI 10.15064/jjpm.49.8_893
Authors

村上 正人, 松野 俊夫, 金 外淑, 小池 一喜, 井上 幹紀親, 三浦 勝浩, 花岡 啓子, 江花 昭一, 橋本 修

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine
#287
of 301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,864
of 122,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 301 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.