↓ Skip to main content

Change in internalized stigma and social functioning among persons diagnosed with severe mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatry Research, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Change in internalized stigma and social functioning among persons diagnosed with severe mental illness
Published in
Psychiatry Research, July 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.06.017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study examined the relationship between change in internalized stigma and social functioning over time. Thirty-five individuals with severe mental illness completed measures of self-stigma, social functioning and symptoms at baseline, 4 months, and 7 months. Change in self-stigma was significantly negatively related to change in social functioning, controlling for negative symptoms.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 13 16%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,424,574
of 32,332,113 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatry Research
#1,084
of 7,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,708
of 203,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatry Research
#11
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,332,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.