| Title |
COVID‐19: legal implications for critical care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anaesthesia, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/anae.15147 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 158 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 58 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 62 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,749,879
of 28,766,646 outputs
Outputs from Anaesthesia
#1,019
of 5,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,413
of 440,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anaesthesia
#46
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,766,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.