| Title |
Identification of depression in diabetes: the efficacy of PHQ-9 and HADS-D
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp10x502128 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Prasuna Reddy, Benjamin Philpot, Dale Ford, James A Dunbar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 20% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 36% |
| Psychology | 17 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,465,512
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#703
of 4,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,704
of 105,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.