↓ Skip to main content

Maternal Nutrition and Birth Outcomes: Effect of Balanced Protein‐Energy Supplementation

Overview of attention for article published in Paediatric & Perinatal Epidemiology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
407 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Maternal Nutrition and Birth Outcomes: Effect of Balanced Protein‐Energy Supplementation
Published in
Paediatric & Perinatal Epidemiology, June 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01308.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The nutritional status of a woman before and during pregnancy is important for a healthy pregnancy outcome. Maternal malnutrition is a key contributor to poor fetal growth, low birthweight (LBW) and short- and long-term infant morbidity and mortality. This review summarised the evidence on association of maternal nutrition with birth outcomes along with review of effects of balanced protein-energy supplementation during pregnancy. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, WHOLIS, PAHO and Cochrane library. Only intervention studies were considered for inclusion and data were combined by meta-analyses if available from more than one study. Sixteen intervention studies were included in the review. Pooled analysis showed a positive impact of balanced protein-energy supplementation on birthweight compared with control [mean difference 73 (g) [95% confidence interval (CI) 30, 117]]. This effect was more pronounced in undernourished women compared with adequately nourished women. Combined data from five studies showed a reduction of 32% in the risk of LBW in the intervention group compared with control [relative risk (RR) 0.68 [95% CI 0.51, 0.92]]. There was a reduction of 34% in the risk of small-for-gestational-age babies in the intervention compared with the control group [RR 0.66 [95% CI 0.49, 0.89]]. The risk of stillbirth was also reduced by 38% in the intervention group compared with control [RR 0.62 [95% CI 0.40, 0.98]]. In conclusion, balanced protein-energy supplementation is an effective intervention to reduce the prevalence of LBW and small-for-gestational-age births, especially in undernourished women.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 400 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 15%
Researcher 49 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 10%
Student > Bachelor 37 9%
Lecturer 20 5%
Other 62 15%
Unknown 139 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 7%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 3%
Other 37 9%
Unknown 151 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,521,710
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Paediatric & Perinatal Epidemiology
#146
of 1,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,588
of 212,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paediatric & Perinatal Epidemiology
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.