↓ Skip to main content

Salvage surgery in patients with recurrent or residual squamous cell carcinoma of the anus

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Surgical Oncology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Salvage surgery in patients with recurrent or residual squamous cell carcinoma of the anus
Published in
European Journal of Surgical Oncology, May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.05.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Anal squamous cell cancers are uncommon, and primary treatment is radical chemoradiotherapy. The role of radical surgery is in salvage of patients with residual and recurrent disease. The primary aim of the study is to determine how often such salvage surgery is required, while the secondary aim is to determine which features indicate salvage surgery may be required and to determine the outcome of salvage surgery. A prospective database was analysed of all patients with anal cancer over an 18 year period (Dec 1996-Jan 2015). The records of patients requiring salvage surgery were reviewed. 203 Patients were identified with anal cancers, of which 180 had squamous cell anal carcinoma. 112 Female (median age 59.4, range 33-92) 68 male (median age 63.8 range 36-87). Of these 27 patients (15%) required salvage surgery. 23 Patients had a R0 resection. 18 Patients had an extended resection (16 R0) while 9 had a routine APR (7 R0). The 30-day post-operative mortality rate was 0%. The overall 5 year survival was 78%, not significantly different from those not requiring salvage surgery (p = 0.23). Age, gender, AJCC stage, T stage, radiation therapy alone, were not predicators of the need for salvage surgery. Salvage surgery is uncommonly required. Extended surgery beyond routine APR is often required to obtain an R0 resection. Excellent patient survival can be achieved in highly selected cases. There were no identifiable clinical predictors of those needing salvage surgery, and consideration should be given to explore molecular and genetic factors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Turkey 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 11 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2016.
All research outputs
#31,180,890
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Surgical Oncology
#3,362
of 3,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,929
of 340,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Surgical Oncology
#60
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.