↓ Skip to main content

Inadvertent Reduction of Symphyseal Diastasis During Computed Tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of orthopaedic trauma, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inadvertent Reduction of Symphyseal Diastasis During Computed Tomography
Published in
Journal of orthopaedic trauma, September 2016
DOI 10.1097/bot.0000000000000627
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine the quantifiable difference in pubic symphysis diastasis when comparing CT scan and pelvic radiographs in individuals with anterior pelvic ring injuries. Retrospective chart and radiographic review SETTING:: Level 1 trauma centerPatients/Participants: Between 2002 and 2013 all individuals requiring internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring were reviewed. Out of 163 patients, 72 met inclusion criteria. Patients with a symphysis dislocation were included if the pelvic radiograph and CT scan were performed without a pelvic binder and imaging was adequate for required measurements. Symphyseal diastasis was measured on the initial pelvic radiograph, the CT scout and axial views. Comparison of measured symphyseal diastasis on CT scan and pelvic radiographs. Seventy-two patients met inclusion criteria. Ninety-seven percent (70/72) had a reduction of their symphysis diastasis in the CT with an average reduction of 6.6 mm (Range -2.6 to 35.5 mm). The average diastasis on radiograph was 26.3 mm compared to 19.7 mm on CT scout (P<0.001). Fourteen patients (19.2%) had a reduction from greater than 25 mm to less than 25 mm - a traditional cut off for operative intervention. The AP pelvis radiograph remains an important part of the workup for trauma patients. Reliance on CT scan alone may underestimate the true degree of pelvic displacement. Failure to obtain pelvic radiographs in the acute setting limits the information in which the medical team can base both immediate and definitive decisions in regards to pelvic ring injuries. Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 6 29%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 62%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2016.
All research outputs
#22,050,684
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from Journal of orthopaedic trauma
#1,555
of 3,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,939
of 338,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of orthopaedic trauma
#43
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.